top of page
Search

Delay of Certain Reporting Requirements for Canada's Federal Plastic's Registry: What it Means

  • Writer: Mimi Martinez Okhuysen
    Mimi Martinez Okhuysen
  • 3 days ago
  • 3 min read

A pause of Canada’s Federal Plastics Registry (FPR) Phases 2 and 3 reporting requirements has gone into effect. The pause was first announced via email, sent by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), to stakeholders in late 2025. On March 14th, this update was formalized and reflected on the FPR website, with ECCC confirming that reporting requirements for Phases 2 and 3 will be delayed. While the announcement may have introduced some uncertainty, it ultimately reflects a broader effort to refine the system before expanding its scope.


The FPR is being implemented in three phases, each phase is designed to build on the previous one and gradually expand the level of detail required in reporting. Phase 1, which is already in effect, focuses on plastics placed on the market that are destined for the consumer waste stream. This includes plastic packaging (both filled and unfilled), electronic and electrical equipment, and single-use or disposable products. Reporting for Phase 1 was first due on September 29, 2025, for the 2024 calendar year, and remains mandatory for all applicable organizations.


Phase 2 is intended to significantly broaden reporting requirements. It expands beyond consumer waste streams to include all Phase 1 plastics regardless of end-of-life destination, as well as additional product categories such as plastic resins, agriculture and horticulture products, tires, transportation materials, construction materials, fishing and aquaculture gear, and textiles and apparel. In certain categories, Phase 2 also requires reporting on plastics that are collected and either recycled or disposed of.


Phase 3 was designed to go even further by requiring more comprehensive reporting on waste generation and management outcomes, expanding the covered categories for recycling and disposal, including additional categories such as electronics and tires. Together, these phases aim to provide a full picture of the lifecycle of plastics in Canada: from production and use to disposal and diversion.


Originally, Phase 2 reporting was scheduled to begin with a deadline of September 29, 2026 (covering 2025 data), and Phase 3 was set to follow with reporting due in September 2027 (covering 2026 data). However, ECCC has now delayed both phases to a later date. The stated reason for this delay is to allow time to streamline and optimize reporting requirements based on stakeholder feedback, as well as to give organizations more time to collect accurate and consistent data. This reflects an acknowledgment that the complexity of the system requires further refinement to ensure it is both effective and feasible.


Looking ahead, ECCC has outlined a clear process for how it will communicate next steps and incorporate stakeholder input. A Notice of Intent is expected to be published in the Canada Gazette in Winter 2026 to formally outline the delay. This will follow a new Notice in Summer 2026 that will set out updated reporting requirements for the 2027, 2028, and 2029 calendar years. Throughout 2026, ECCC plans to offer engagement opportunities for stakeholders to provide input on the design and structure of Phases 2 and 3. This engagement process is intended to help reshape the future phases in a way that improves data quality, reduces reporting challenges, and aligns more closely with real-world operational constraints.


Despite the delay of Phases 2 and 3, it is important to emphasize that Phase 1 reporting requirements remain fully in effect. Organizations that fall under Phase 1 must continue to meet their reporting obligations for all applicable years. Given the context of Phases 2 and 3 being further refined, accurate and correct reporting methods for Phase 1 can be seen as especially important, seeing as Phase 1 data, processes, and definitions are being analyzed and used as the foundation for how the future phases are implemented and expanded.


For companies that are already investing in compliance and data systems, the delay presents a valuable opportunity. Rather than slowing progress, the delay can allow organizations to strengthen their internal processes, improve data accuracy, and prepare for the eventual rollout of Phases 2 and 3. It also creates space for companies to actively participate in shaping the future of the Registry through stakeholder engagement.




 

 

 

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page